Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
View saved research
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Telemedicine approaches to autism (ASD) assessment have become increasingly common, yet few validated tools exist for this purpose. This study presents results from a clinical trial investigating two approaches to tele-assessment for ASD in toddlers. Methods: 144 children (29% female) between 17 and 36 months of age (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 0.33 years) completed tele-assessment using either the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP) or an experimental remote administration of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT). All children then completed traditional in-person assessment with a blinded clinician, using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS-3), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Both tele-assessment and in-person assessment included a clinical interview with caregivers. Results: Results indicated diagnostic agreement for 92% of participants. Children diagnosed with ASD following in-person assessment who were missed by tele-assessment (n = 8) had lower scores on tele- and in-person ASD assessment tools. Children inaccurately identified as having ASD by tele-assessment (n = 3) were younger than other children and had higher developmental and adaptive behavior scores than children accurately diagnosed with ASD by tele-assessment. Diagnostic certainty was highest for children correctly identified as having ASD via tele-assessment. Clinicians and caregivers reported satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures. Conclusion: This work provides additional support for the use of tele-assessment for identification of ASD in toddlers, with both clinicians and families reporting broad acceptability. Continued development and refinement of tele-assessment procedures is recommended to optimize this approach for the needs of varying clinicians, families, and circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by funding from NIH/NIMH (R21MH118539), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54 HD08321), and the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research. The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) is funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program, Award Number 5UL1TR002243-03.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first draft of the manuscript was written by Laura Corona. Madison Hooper completed substantial data analysis and reviewed multiple drafts of the manuscript. Liliana Wagner and Amy Weitlauf reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to study design and/or data collection. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Data included in this manuscript can be accessed in the NIMH Data Archive. Dataset identifiers: https://doi.org/10.15154/1528433.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura L. Corona.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors Corona, Wagner, Weitlauf, Hine, Nicholson, Stone, and Warren are authors of the TAP. They do not receive compensation related to use of this tool.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corona, L.L., Wagner, L., Hooper, M. et al. A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers. J Autism Dev Disord 54, 2069–2080 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Laura L. Corona